Hello pricey customer to our community We will proffer you an answer to this query pr.likelihood – Pedestrian proof of Gaussian chaos for order-two poynomial? ,and the respond will breathe typical by documented info sources, We welcome you and proffer you fresh questions and solutions, Many customer are questioning in regards to the respond to this query.

pr.likelihood – Pedestrian proof of Gaussian chaos for order-two poynomial?

Let $ell geqslant 1$. Let us deem $(g_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ identically distributed idependent actual gaussian variables and actual quantity $(a_{n_1,dots n_{ell}})_{(n_1, dots, n_{ell}s)inmathbb{N}^{ell}}$. We deem the random variable

$$G(omega)=sum_{n_1, dots, n_{ell}}a_{n_1, dots, n_{ell}} g_{n_1}(omega) cdots g_{n_{ell}}(omega)$$

the place we write $omega in Omega$ the likelihood area at hand.

It is named Gaussian polynomial chaos (or Wiener chaos)

$$|G(omega)|_{L^p_{Omega}} lesssim p^{frac{ell}{2}} |G(omega)|_{L^2_{Omega}}.$$

The benchmark proof of this outcomes makes use of hypercontractivity of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck semigroup.

My query is the next: within the illustration $ell =2$ and $p=2k$ an plane integer,

Is it workable to show “directly by hand” that

$$mathbb{E}[|G(omega)|^{2k}] leqslant C ok^{2k}mathbb{E}[|G(omega)|^2]^ok.$$

If sure, is there a reference bespeak/article to search out it? Or is it workable to terminate my tried proof?

This doesn’t appear inconceivable. At least, when one expands the left-hand aspect, we’ve got

$$mathbb{E}[|G(omega)|^{2k}] = sum_{substack{n_1,dots ,n_k m_1, dots, m_k}}a_{n_1,m_1} dots a_{n_{2k},m_{2k}}mathbb{E}[g_{n_1}g_{m_1}cdots g_{n_{2k}}g_{m_{2k}}].$$

From there, one can employ the truth that $mathbb{E}[g^{2m+1}]=0$ for any $m$ to deduce that within the above, the expectation is non-vanishing provided that the indices ${n_i, m_i}$ emerge an plane variety of time. So specifically, all $n_i, m_i$ are paired.

The privilege hand aspect reads

$$ok^{2k}mathbb{E}[|G(omega)|^2]^ok = ok^{2k}sum_{substack{n_1,dots ,n_k m_1, dots, m_k}}a_{n_1,m_1} dots a_{n_{2k},m_{2k}}prod_{i=1}^kmathbb{E}[g_{n_i}g_{m_i}g_{n_{k+i}}g_{m_{k+i}}].$$

Also, comment that within the LHS, when all of the $g_i$ are equal, then we’ve got $mathbb{E}[g^{4k}] lesssim ok^{2k}$, which is the rectify magnitude which we search for.

However I’m not capable of show that $LHS leqslant RHS$. But I stay satisfied that there ought to breathe someplace to search out such a proof however I didn’t find it within the litterature.

we’ll proffer you the answer to pr.likelihood – Pedestrian proof of Gaussian chaos for order-two poynomial? query through our community which brings all of the solutions from a number of dependable sources.

## Add comment